United States v. Dunn
This text of 70 M.J. 359 (United States v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
CCA S31584. On further consideration of the granted issue (69 M.J. 457-58 (C.A.A.F. 2010)), it is ordered that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issue in light of United States v. Sweeney, 70 M.J. 296 (C.A.A.F. 2011), United States v. Blazier, 69 M.J. 218 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and United States v. Blazier, 68 M.J. 439 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and to determine whether the erroneous admission of the cover memoranda and specimen custody documents of the drug testing report was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 M.J. 359, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dunn-armfor-2011.