United States v. Duncan

25 F. Cas. 938, 4 McLean 207
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Duncan. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 F. Cas. 926
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois·Decided June 15, 1847·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT. Judgments were obtained in this court in 1841, which are a lien on the lands of the ancestor of the defendants, throughout the state. In 1846, there was a decree against the same, in favor of the plaintiffs, for forty-nine thousand dollars. Certain judgments have been subsequently entered against the same person, in Morgan county state court, for about six hundred dollars, which create a lien upon the lands in that county. Executions have been issued on the judgments of the United States, and a motion is now made to direct the other lands of Duncan’s heirs in the state, to be sold, in satisfaction of the judgments and decrees above stated. 1 Paige, 185; 19 Johns. 493; 1 Stat. 515.

The court order, that should the land in Morgan county sell for more than the amount of the judgments of the United States, entered in 1841, the solicitor or agent of the United States, shall retain in his own hands such surplus, subject to the order of this court. Or, should such lands sell for less than the balance of said judgments, and the other lands subject to the decree shall sell for more money than the amount of such decree, the surplus shall be held by the solicitor and agent of the United States, subject to the disposition of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Duncan, 25 F. Cas. 938, 4 McLean 207 (circtdil 1847).

25 F. Cas. 938 (United States v. Duncan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evertson v. Booth
19 Johns. 486 (New York Supreme Court, 1822)
Rogers v. Rogers
1 Paige Ch. 183 (New York Court of Chancery, 1828)