United States v. Duncan

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6207

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARK JEFFREY DUNCAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-40-R, CA-99-134-7)

Submitted: August 29, 2000 Decided: September 14, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Jeffrey Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Mark Jeffrey Duncan seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We grant Duncan’s motion to file a supplement to his in-

formal brief. We have reviewed the record, the district court’s

opinion, and Duncan’s pleadings, and we find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Duncan, Nos. CR-96-40-R; CA-99-134-7 (W.D. Va. Feb. 2, 2000).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED