United States v. Dunaway

64 F.2d 535, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 4143
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 13, 1933·No. Nos. 6714, 6715, 6823·Published

Opinion

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

These three cases are appeals from judgments awarding recoveries on policies of war risk insurance. In each case a motion of defendant for a directed verdict was overruled, and error is assigned thereto. They may be conveniently disposed of in one opinion.

It would servo no good purpose to review the evidence. It is sufficient to say that in our opinion the plaintiffs have failed to support the burden of proving that the soldiers became totally and permanently disabled while the policies were in force. The cases are similar to that of U. S. v. Howard (C. C. A.) decided this day, 64 F.(2d) 533, and are ruled by the decision in that case. It was error to refuse to direct verdicts for defendants. The judgment in each ease is reversed, and the case remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dunaway, 64 F.2d 535, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 4143 (5th Cir. 1933).

64 F.2d 535 (United States v. Dunaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Howard
64 F.2d 533 (Fifth Circuit, 1933)