United States v. Dulany

District of Columbia

United States v. Dulany

1 D.C. 510

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedNovember 15, 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 510 (United States v. Dulany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Dulany, 1 D.C. 510 (D.D.C. 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

(Duckett, J., absent,)

said that in such cases, upon the motion of the Attorney for the United States, they would order indictments to be sent up without a prosecutor’s name being indorsed, upon the attorney’s suggesting that in his opinion the cases require such interposition.

Mr. Jones replied that he could not undertake to give any opinion, but he should never make a motion in any case which should appear to him to be malicious or trifling.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

(Duckett, J., absent,)

said that in such cases, upon the motion of the Attorney for the United States, they would order indictments to be sent up without a prosecutor’s name being indorsed, upon the attorney’s suggesting that in his opinion the cases require such interposition.

Mr. Jones replied that he could not undertake to give any opinion, but he should never make a motion in any case which should appear to him to be malicious or trifling.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 D.C. 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dulany-dcd-1808.