United States v. Duke

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Duke

328 F. App'x 609

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 1, 2009·No. No. 08-15190·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel for Jonathan David Duke in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Duke’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel for Jonathan David Duke in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Duke’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Duke, 328 F. App'x 609 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

328 F. App'x 609 (United States v. Duke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related