United States v. Duarte
This text of United States v. Duarte (United States v. Duarte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 4, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 02-10854 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FERMIN DUARTE,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CR-331-3-P --------------------
Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Fermin Duarte appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea
conviction for conspiring to possess amphetamine with intent to
distribute. He contends that the district court erred in relying
upon the presentence report (PSR) for the drug quantity because the
PSR lacked sufficient indicia of reliability to support the
calculations. He has not established that the PSR lacked
sufficient indicia of reliability for sentencing purposes. Cf.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-10854 -2-
United States v. Shacklett, 921 F.2d 580, 584 (5th Cir. 1991).
Because Duarte did not dispute the findings of the PSR, he cannot
show that the district court clearly erred in relying upon the
information contained in the PSR. See United States v. Alford, 142
F.3d 825, 832 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Davis, 76 F.3d 82,
84 (5th Cir. 1996).
Duarte also contends that the district court erred in denying
him a reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 for his role as a
minor or minimal participant in the conspiracy. He has not
established that the district court committed clear error in
denying the reduction. See United States v. Gallegos, 868 F.2d
711, 713 (5th Cir. 1989). The judgment of the district court is
therefore AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Duarte, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-duarte-ca5-2003.