United States v. Duane Younger

926 F.2d 1216, 288 U.S. App. D.C. 343, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4628, 1991 WL 33472
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1991
Docket90-3094
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 926 F.2d 1216 (United States v. Duane Younger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Duane Younger, 926 F.2d 1216, 288 U.S. App. D.C. 343, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4628, 1991 WL 33472 (D.C. Cir. 1991).

Opinion

926 F.2d 1216

288 U.S.App.D.C. 343

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Duane YOUNGER, Appellant.

No. 90-3094.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 14, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Criminal No. 89-00063-01; Thomas F. Hogan, J.

D.D.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties and arguments by counsel. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c).

Appellant Younger contends that the police conducted an unlawful search of his automobile. For the reasons stated by the district court in denying appellant's motion to suppress, we affirm the validity of that search.

ORDERED and ADJUDGED by the court that the district court's denial of the motion to suppress be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.R. 15(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lonnie Martin
926 F.2d 1216 (D.C. Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
926 F.2d 1216, 288 U.S. App. D.C. 343, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4628, 1991 WL 33472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-duane-younger-cadc-1991.