United States v. Duane L. Kuyper

577 F. App'x 626
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 18, 2014
Docket13-3545
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 577 F. App'x 626 (United States v. Duane L. Kuyper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Duane L. Kuyper, 577 F. App'x 626 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

*627 PER CURIAM.

Duane and Mary Kuyper appeal the district court’s 1 entry of default judgment against them as a sanction for failing to appear at their noticed depositions. Following careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that, for the reasons explained in the district court’s order, the court did not abuse its discretion. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(d); Int’I Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local Union No. 545 v. Hope Elec. Corp., 380 F.3d 1084, 1105 (8th Cir.2004) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation in the District of South Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mahoney
E.D. Missouri, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
577 F. App'x 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-duane-l-kuyper-ca8-2014.