United States v. Driggins

22 C.M.A. 563
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided December 21, 1973·No. No. 27,650·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

The sentence affirmed by the Court of Military Review is set aside and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the U. S. Army for resubmission to the U. S. Army Court of Military Review for reassessment of the sentence in light of United States v Alderman, 22 USCMA 298, 46 CMR 298 (1973).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Driggins, 22 C.M.A. 563 (cma 1973).

22 C.M.A. 563 (United States v. Driggins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.