United States v. Drew

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Drew

590 F. App'x 266

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 26, 2015·No. No. 13-7293·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Amils Barnard Drew appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Drew, Nos. 5:10-cr-[267]*26700064-BR-2, 5:12-cv-00517-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2013); see Whiteside v. United States, 775 F.3d 180, 2014 WL 7245453 (4th Cir. Dec. 19, 2014) (en banc). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Amils Barnard Drew appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Drew, Nos. 5:10-cr-[267]*26700064-BR-2, 5:12-cv-00517-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2013); see Whiteside v. United States, 775 F.3d 180, 2014 WL 7245453 (4th Cir. Dec. 19, 2014) (en banc). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Drew, 590 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

590 F. App'x 266 (United States v. Drew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related