United States v. Drayton

76 M.J. 400, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 592
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJune 6, 2017
DocketNo. 17-0407/AF
StatusPublished

This text of 76 M.J. 400 (United States v. Drayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Drayton, 76 M.J. 400, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 592 (Ark. 2017).

Opinion

CCA S32374. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that the Court of Criminal Appeals stated that Appellant’s approved sentence included a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 12 months, forfeiture of $850.00 pay per month for 12 months, and reduction to E-l. It then affirmed that sentence. In fact, the sentence approved by , the convening authority reduced the confinement to 8 months. Accordingly, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings and to only so much of the sentence as provides for confinement for 8 months, forfeiture of $850,00 pay per month for 12 months, reduction to E-l, and a bad-conduct discharge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 400, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-drayton-armfor-2017.