United States v. Drake

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Drake

218 F. App'x 329

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2007·No. 05-41051·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Court-appointed counsel for Lynn Drake has moved for leave to withdraw from representation and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Drake has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this AP *330 PEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Court-appointed counsel for Lynn Drake has moved for leave to withdraw from representation and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Drake has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this AP *330 PEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4

United States v. Drake, 218 F. App'x 329 (5th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

218 F. App'x 329 (United States v. Drake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related