United States v. Douglas Packett

125 F. App'x 761
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 14, 2005
Docket04-3742
StatusUnpublished

This text of 125 F. App'x 761 (United States v. Douglas Packett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Douglas Packett, 125 F. App'x 761 (8th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Packett (Packett) challenges the sentence imposed by the district court after Packett pled guilty to charges of (1) conspiring to distribute cocaine base and methamphetamine, and (2) possessing a firearm in connection with that offense. Judgment was entered on September 16, 2004, but Packett’s notice of appeal was not filed until November 8, 2004. See Fed. RApp. P. 4(b)(l)(A)(i) (requiring criminal defendant to file notice of appeal within 10 days of entry of judgment). Although Packett filed a motion for an extension of time in which to file his notice of appeal, which the district court granted, the motion was filed more than 30 days after the 10-day appeal period expired. Cf. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4) (“Upon a finding of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may ... extend the time to file a notice of appeal for a period not to exceed 30 days from the expiration of the time otherwise prescribed by [] Rule 4(b).”). Because the district court’s authority to extend the time to file the notice of appeal ended before November 8, Packett’s notice of appeal is untimely. Id. United States v. Carter, 990 F.2d 402, 403 (8th Cir.1993) (per curiam).

Because Packett’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Edward C. Carter
990 F.2d 402 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 F. App'x 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-douglas-packett-ca8-2005.