United States v. Douglas Hirano
This text of United States v. Douglas Hirano (United States v. Douglas Hirano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10395
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:99-cr-00465-ACK-1
v.
DOUGLAS AKIRA HIRANO, AKA Kevin MEMORANDUM* Higashi,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Alan C. Kay, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2022**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Douglas Akira Hirano appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 8-month sentence and a special condition of supervised release
imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We dismiss his appeal as moot.
While this appeal was pending, Hirano finished serving his 8-month
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). sentence and had his supervised release revoked again. Because he is no longer
subject to the sentence imposed by the judgment on appeal, we can provide no
effective relief as to his claims of sentencing error, and we dismiss this appeal as
moot. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).
DISMISSED.
2 20-10395
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Douglas Hirano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-douglas-hirano-ca9-2022.