United States v. Douglas

Opinion

Case: 23-11139 Document: 69-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-11139 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ December 17, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Rodrik Douglas,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:23-CR-19-1 ______________________________

Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Rodrik Douglas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Douglas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-11139 Document: 69-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2024

No. 23-11139

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.