United States v. Double Springs Distillers, Inc.

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Double Springs Distillers, Inc.

194 F.2d 541, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2806

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 21, 1952·No. 11453·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

On consideration whereof, it appearing that this suit was filed July 6, 1950;

And it appearing that Section 2901 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended *542 by Act of February 21, 1950, 64 Stat. 7, became effective September 1, 1950, 26 U. S.C.A. § 2901, and by its own terms was not applicable to any suit filed before it took effect:

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is affirmed, upon authority of Stitzel-Weller Distillery, Inc., v. United States, D.C., 82 F.Supp. 50, affirmed 6 Cir., 180 F.2d 357.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

On consideration whereof, it appearing that this suit was filed July 6, 1950;

And it appearing that Section 2901 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended *542 by Act of February 21, 1950, 64 Stat. 7, became effective September 1, 1950, 26 U. S.C.A. § 2901, and by its own terms was not applicable to any suit filed before it took effect:

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is affirmed, upon authority of Stitzel-Weller Distillery, Inc., v. United States, D.C., 82 F.Supp. 50, affirmed 6 Cir., 180 F.2d 357.

United States v. Double Springs Distillers, Inc., 194 F.2d 541, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2806 (6th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

194 F.2d 541 (United States v. Double Springs Distillers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related