United States v. Dossey

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Dossey

355 F. App'x 372

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedDecember 8, 2009

DocketNo. 09-12787

StatusPublished

This text of 355 F. App'x 372 (United States v. Dossey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Dossey, 355 F. App'x 372 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Randolph Murrell and Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Matthew Dossey, have filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dossey’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Randolph Murrell and Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Matthew Dossey, have filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dossey’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

355 F. App'x 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dossey-ca11-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack