United States v. Doris McKinney
This text of 74 F. App'x 675 (United States v. Doris McKinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Doris McKinney appeals her conviction and sentence. A jury found McKinney guilty of executing a scheme to defraud a financial institution. See 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (2000). The District Court 1 sentenced McKinney to one month of imprisonment and five years of supervised release, with the condition that she participate in a home-confinement program for five months. On appeal, McKinney’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the District Court erred in denying her motion for a downward departure.
The District Court’s discretionary decision not to grant the downward departure is unreviewable absent an unconstitutional motive. See United States v. VanHouten, 307 F.3d 693, 696 (8th Cir.2002). Following careful review of the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issues. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
A true copy.
. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 F. App'x 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-doris-mckinney-ca8-2003.