United States v. Donovan Shabazz

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: May 20, 2025
• Docket: 25-10930
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 25-10930 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 05/20/2025 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 25-10930 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DONOVAN SHABAZZ, a.k.a. Harold Baker,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cr-00362-VMC-AAS-1 USCA11 Case: 25-10930 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 05/20/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-10930

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Donavan Shabazz, pro se, appeals from the district court’s March 10, 2025, paperless order denying his motion for extension of time to file pretrial motions. However, this order is not final, because all counts in the superseding indictment remain pending, i.e., Shabazz has not been convicted or sentenced. See Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 263 (1984) (providing that the rule of finality “prohibits appellate review until conviction and imposition of sentence”). Moreover, the court’s order is not immediately ap- pealable under the collateral order doctrine. See United States v. Shalhoub, 855 F.3d 1255, 1260 (11th Cir. 2017) (describing the col- lateral order doctrine and recognizing a limited number of orders that implicate the doctrine in the context of a criminal case). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.