United States v. Donnie Lamont Blount and Gaylin Terod Johnson
This text of 104 F.3d 58 (United States v. Donnie Lamont Blount and Gaylin Terod Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Donnie Lamont BLOUNT and Gaylin Terod Johnson, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 95-20359.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 9, 1997.
Alice Ann Burns, Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Attorney's Office, Paula Camille Offenhauser, Houston, TX, for plaintiff-appellee.
Robert E. Dolan, Houston, TX, for Gaylin Terod Johnson, defendant-appellant.
George McCall Secrest, Jr., Bennett, Secrest & Meyers, Houston, TX, for Donnie Lamont Blount, defendant-appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Melinda Harmon, Judge.
(Opinion October 22, 1996, 5 Cir., 1996, 98 F.3d 1489).
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A majority of judges in active service having determined, on the Court's own motion, to rehear this case en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 F.3d 58, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-donnie-lamont-blount-and-gaylin-terod-johnson-ca5-1997.