United States v. Donnell Coppedge

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2014·No. 14-7293·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7293

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DONNELL COPPEDGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (4:09-cr-00054-F-1)

Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnell Coppedge, Appellant Pro Se. Rudulf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Shailika S. Kotiya, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; William Glenn Perry, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donnell Coppedge appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a new sentencing hearing. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Coppedge, No. 4:09-cr-00054-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1,

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Donnell Coppedge, (4th Cir. 2014).

United States v. Donnell Coppedge (United States v. Donnell Coppedge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.