United States v. Donikki Hardy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6487

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DONIKKI HARDY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00235-HMH-1)

Submitted: July 30, 2015 Decided: August 11, 2015

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donikki Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. James Galyean, NEXSEN PRUET, Greenville, South Carolina; Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donikki Hardy appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R. Crim. P.

35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Hardy, No.

7:01-cr-00235-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 23, 2015). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED