United States v. Donchevich

59 F. App'x 950
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 20, 2003·No. No. 02-50322; D.C. No. CR-00-00119-BTM·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gregory Henrick Donchevich appeals the sentence imposed upon revocation of his term of supervised release. He contends that 18 U.S.C. § 3583, which authorizes the imposition of a term of supervised release, is unconstitutional as applied under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Liero, 298 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir.2002).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Donchevich, 59 F. App'x 950 (9th Cir. 2003).

59 F. App'x 950 (United States v. Donchevich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Jose Romero Liero
298 F.3d 1175 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)