United States v. Donald Seeds

869 F.2d 1494, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1649, 1989 WL 11447
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 14, 1989
Docket88-5940
StatusUnpublished

This text of 869 F.2d 1494 (United States v. Donald Seeds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Donald Seeds, 869 F.2d 1494, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1649, 1989 WL 11447 (6th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

869 F.2d 1494

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Donald SEEDS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 88-5940.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 14, 1989.

Before KRUPANSKY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and CHARLES W. JOINER, Senior District Judge*.

ORDER

Defendant appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss with prejudice criminal charges pending against him in the district court. The government moves for dismissal of the appeal due to lack of appellate jurisdiction. Defendant has not responded.

The defendant's motion to dismiss the charges alleged violations of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, (Act) 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3161 et seq. A pretrial order denying a motion to dismiss an indictment based on violations of the Act is not an appealable decision. United States v. Bilsky, 664 F.2d 613 (6th Cir.1981). See also United States v. Bratcher, 833 F.2d 69 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 108 S.Ct. 760 (1988) (dismissal of an indictment without prejudice on basis of Speedy Trial Act was not an appealable collateral order).

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is granted.

*

The Honorable Charles W. Joiner, U.S. Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robert E. Bratcher
833 F.2d 69 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Bilsky
664 F.2d 613 (Sixth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
869 F.2d 1494, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1649, 1989 WL 11447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-donald-seeds-ca6-1989.