United States v. Donald Ratliff Cady

491 F.2d 1258, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9848
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Donald Ratliff Cady. Read the opinion of the Court — 495 F.2d 742
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 1, 1974·No. 73-1345·Published

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Appellant Donald Ratliff Cady entered a plea of guilty to an information charging him with violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3 as an accessory after the fact to the crime of aggravated bank robbery (18 U.S.C. § 2113(d)). He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. After filing a timely notice of appeal, appellant failed to file a brief or otherwise assert any claim of error in the proceedings below. A careful review of the record reveals no prejudicial error. This court has previously extended the time for the filing of briefs and has notified appellant *1259 that failure to comply with the briefing schedule would result in dismissal under Local Rule 9(a).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Donald Ratliff Cady, 491 F.2d 1258, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9848 (8th Cir. 1974).

491 F.2d 1258 (United States v. Donald Ratliff Cady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related