United States v. Donald Mitchell

270 F. App'x 940
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Donald Mitchell. Read the opinion of the Court — 348 F. App'x 430
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 26, 2008·No. 07-14577·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Peter Warren Kenny, appointed counsel for Donald Mitchell in this appeal of the revocation of Mitchell’s supervised release and subsequent sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Mitchell’s supervised release and subsequent sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Donald Mitchell, 270 F. App'x 940 (11th Cir. 2008).

270 F. App'x 940 (United States v. Donald Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)