United States v. Donald McCoy, Jr.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 18 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-30068
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:16-cr-00284-JLR
v.
DONALD McCOY, Jr., MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 15, 2019**
Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Donald McCoy, Jr., appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 24-year sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
production, distribution, and possession of child pornography, in violation of 18
U.S.C. §§ 2251(a) and 2252. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.
McCoy first contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to
consider each of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and address his
mitigating arguments. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-
Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude that there is none.
The record reflects that the district court explicitly acknowledged and considered
each of the sentencing factors, as well as McCoy’s mitigating arguments, but was
not persuaded that they warranted a lower sentence.
McCoy also argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The
district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38,
51 (2007). The 24-year sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the section
3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the
seriousness of the offense, the impact on the victims, the need to provide
deterrence to others, and the need to protect the public. See id.
AFFIRMED.
2 18-30068
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Donald McCoy, Jr. (United States v. Donald McCoy, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.