United States v. Donald Maurice Johnson
This text of 435 F.2d 1312 (United States v. Donald Maurice Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
There was sufficient evidence on the heroin count (the one seriously contested) to permit the case to go to the jury. We do not find that the presumption allowed by Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 90 S.Ct. 642, 24 L.Ed.2d 610, was used.
The point about no members of appellant’s race being on the jury falls under Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202, 85 S.Ct. 824, 13 L.Ed.2d 759, because there was no tender of a showing that such members were systematically excluded.
The testimony about association with another charged with a crime we find harmless, if it was improperly admitted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 F.2d 1312, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-donald-maurice-johnson-ca9-1971.