United States v. Donald Lamont Postell

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Donald Lamont Postell

23 F.3d 404, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18598, 1994 WL 170695

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 6, 1994

Docket92-6982

StatusPublished

This text of 23 F.3d 404 (United States v. Donald Lamont Postell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Donald Lamont Postell, 23 F.3d 404, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18598, 1994 WL 170695 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

23 F.3d 404
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Donald Lamont POSTELL, Defendant Appellant.

No. 92-6982.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 30, 1993.
Decided May 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CR-88-136-C-CR, CA-92-58-3-P)

Donald Lamont Postell, Appellant Pro Se.

Harry Thomas Church, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charlotte, NC. for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Donald Lamont Postell appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Postell, No. CR-88-136-C-CR (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisioal process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

23 F.3d 404
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Donald Lamont POSTELL, Defendant Appellant.

No. 92-6982.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 30, 1993.
Decided May 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CR-88-136-C-CR, CA-92-58-3-P)

Donald Lamont Postell, Appellant Pro Se.

Harry Thomas Church, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charlotte, NC. for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Donald Lamont Postell appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Postell, No. CR-88-136-C-CR (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisioal process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 F.3d 404, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18598, 1994 WL 170695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-donald-lamont-postell-ca4-1994.