United States v. Donald G. Karras, Lisa Karras

60 F.3d 831, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25424, 1995 WL 413317
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 14, 1995
Docket94-3503
StatusUnpublished

This text of 60 F.3d 831 (United States v. Donald G. Karras, Lisa Karras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Donald G. Karras, Lisa Karras, 60 F.3d 831, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25424, 1995 WL 413317 (8th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

60 F.3d 831

76 A.F.T.R.2d 95-5743

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Donald G. KARRAS, Lisa Karras, Appellants.

No. 94-3503.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: July 5, 1995.
Filed: July 14, 1995.

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Donald and Lisa Karras appeal from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the District of South Dakota, granting the government summary judgment in its action to foreclose on settlement proceeds received by their father, Chris Karras, in partial satisfaction of tax liens arising from Chris's unpaid taxes. For reversal, appellants argue the district court erred in finding an agreement between Donald and Chris, which they maintained entitled them to the settlement funds, was champertous. They also argue they had an equitable lien on those funds, which took priority over the tax lien.

We have reviewed de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, see Karras v. Karras, 16 F.3d 245, 247 (8th Cir. 1994) (per curiam), including the district court's determination of state law, see United States v. Bryant, 15 F.3d 756, 758 (8th Cir. 1994). Finding no error of law or fact, and believing that an opinion would be of no precedential value, we summarily affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable John B. Jones, Senior United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hansen v. Commissioner of Irs
68 F.3d 470 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Bryant
15 F.3d 756 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
Karras v. Karras
16 F.3d 245 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 F.3d 831, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25424, 1995 WL 413317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-donald-g-karras-lisa-karras-ca8-1995.