United States v. Donald Duhart
Opinion
Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans, appointed counsel for Donald Duhart in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in her opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Duhart’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
379 F. App'x 814 (United States v. Donald Duhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.