United States v. Donald Duhart

379 F. App'x 814
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 12, 2010·No. 09-13044·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans, appointed counsel for Donald Duhart in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in her opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Duhart’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Donald Duhart, 379 F. App'x 814 (11th Cir. 2010).

379 F. App'x 814 (United States v. Donald Duhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Donald Duhart
Eleventh Circuit, 2020