United States v. Donald Carl Hunt

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Donald Carl Hunt

54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17626, 1995 WL 302255

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 18, 1995

Docket94-7218

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 774 (United States v. Donald Carl Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Donald Carl Hunt, 54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17626, 1995 WL 302255 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Donald Carl HUNT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-7218.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 18, 1995.

Donald Carl Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas J. Ashcraft, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hunt, No. CR-91-121 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

In light of this disposition, Hunt's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Donald Carl HUNT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-7218.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 18, 1995.

Donald Carl Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas J. Ashcraft, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hunt, No. CR-91-121 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

In light of this disposition, Hunt's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17626, 1995 WL 302255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-donald-carl-hunt-ca4-1995.