United States v. Donald Andrews

489 F. App'x 998
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 23, 2012
Docket12-1452
StatusUnpublished

This text of 489 F. App'x 998 (United States v. Donald Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Donald Andrews, 489 F. App'x 998 (8th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After Donald Andrews pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute more than 50 grams of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(viii), and 846, the district court 1 sentenced Mr. Andrews to the mandatory minimum of 60 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. On appeal, counsel moves to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

The district court correctly concluded that the 5-year statutory minimum sentence applied, based on the unobjected-to drug quantity recommended in the presen-tence report. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(l)(B)(viii); United States v. Douglas, 646 F.3d 1134, 1137 (8th Cir.2011) (if defendant objects only to presen-tence report’s recommendation, but not to facts themselves, court may accept facts as true). The court lacked discretion under the circumstances to sentence Mr. Andrews below the statutory minimum. See United States v. Watts, 553 F.3d 603, 604 (8th Cir.2009). We have reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accord *999 ingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing appellant about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Douglas
646 F.3d 1134 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Watts
553 F.3d 603 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 F. App'x 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-donald-andrews-ca8-2012.