United States v. Don Benny Anderson
This text of 60 F.3d 825 (United States v. Don Benny Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 825
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Don Benny ANDERSON, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 94-7016.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 7, 1995.
Don Benny Anderson, appellant Pro Se. Kenneth E. Melson, Office of the U.S. Atty., Alexandria, VA, for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Anderson, No. CR-83-159-A (E.D.Va. Aug. 23, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 825, 1995 WL 419146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-don-benny-anderson-ca4-1995.