United States v. Dominick Tufaro

Second Circuit

United States v. Dominick Tufaro

316 F.2d 240, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5484

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 24, 1963

Docket28010

StatusPublished

This text of 316 F.2d 240 (United States v. Dominick Tufaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Dominick Tufaro, 316 F.2d 240, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5484 (2d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

316 F.2d 240

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Dominick TUFARO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 349, Docket 28010.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 24, 1963.
Decided April 24, 1963.

Theodore Krieger, New York City (Albert J. Krieger, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Martin R. Gold, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., Southern District of New Yokr, New York City, and Peter Emmet Fleming, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., New Yokr City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SWAN and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York entered upon a jury verdict convicting the defendant of a violation of the narcotic laws and conspiracy so to do, 21 U.S.C. 173 and 174.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI