United States v. Dominguez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2026·No. 25-11278·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 25-11278 Document: 52-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/11/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit

FILED

No. 25-11278 August 11, 2026 Summary Calendar

Lyle W. Cayce

____________ Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Justin Lee Dominguez,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:25-CR-44-13

Before Elrod, Chief Judge, and Wilson and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Justin Lee Dominguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dominguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 25-11278 Document: 52-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/11/2026

No. 25-11278

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dominguez, (5th Cir. 2026).

United States v. Dominguez (United States v. Dominguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)