United States v. Dominguez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Dominguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 F. App'x 458
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 18, 2002·No. 02-50297·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50297 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE DOMINGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-1843-ALL-DB -------------------- October 17, 2002

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court appointed counsel for Jose Dominguez (“Dominguez”),

the Federal Public Defender, has moved for leave to withdraw from

this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dominguez has received a copy

of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-50297 -2-

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dominguez, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Dominguez (United States v. Dominguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)