United States v. Doescher

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41134 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHANE RAY DOESCHER,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 4:04-CR-93-1 --------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Shane Ray Doescher has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Doescher has

responded to counsel’s motion, moving for leave to file a

“controlling supplemental amendment.” Doescher has also moved

this court to reconsider its previous without-prejudice denial of

counsel’s motion to withdraw, and he has filed two motions for

the appointment of counsel.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-41134 -2-

Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Doescher’s

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for

appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. All other

motions are DENIED.