United States v. Doe
This text of 331 F. App'x 515 (United States v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
John Doe appeals from the district court’s order recommitting him to a federal medical center for no more than 45 days to complete a dangerousness evaluation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246(a). The district court previously determined under 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d) that Doe was incompetent to stand trial on federal criminal charges and that he was not restorable to competency. Doe’s claims are foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Godinez-Ortiz, 563 F.3d 1022 (9th Cir.2009). We have jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine, and we affirm the district court order. See id.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
331 F. App'x 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-doe-ca9-2009.