United States v. Dodson

82 F. App'x 799
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Dodson. Read the opinion of the Court — 77 F. App'x 196
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2003·No. No. 03-7207·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Edward Dodson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his “Motion to Dismiss” and “Affidavit of Specific Negative Averment” nominally pursuant to “Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(B)(2).” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Dodson, 1995 WL 30537, No. CR-94-106 (W.D.Va. filed July 21, 2003 & entered July 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dodson, 82 F. App'x 799 (4th Cir. 2003).

82 F. App'x 799 (United States v. Dodson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.