United States v. Dodson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6844
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
Versus
RALEIGH MILTON DODSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-106, CA-98-346-R)
Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 4, 1998
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raleigh Milton Dodson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Dodson, Nos. CR-94-106; CA-98-346-R (W.D.
Va. May 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Dodson (United States v. Dodson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.