United States v. Dodge

260 F. Supp. 929, 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7373
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMarch 30, 1966
Docket64 Cr. 619
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 260 F. Supp. 929 (United States v. Dodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Dodge, 260 F. Supp. 929, 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7373 (S.D.N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

LUMBARD, Chief Judge.

Application of Theodore Krieger, Esq. for compensation under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A

The payment of compensation to the extent of $1,800 is approved.

The trial of this case lasted from October 18 to and including November 10, 1965, altogether 17 court days. In addition, counsel spent a total of 48 hours in interviews and legal research outside of court.

I find this to be the kind of “protracted representation” which the statute had in mind when it provided that payment in excess of the $500 limit of compensation to counsel could be made in such “extraordinary circumstances.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(c).

The trial judge approved the claim in the total of $2,175 which was at the maximum rate of $15 per hour for 113 hours in court and $10 per hour for 48 hours of time out of court.

As a payment in excess of the $500 limit fixed by the statute for representation in an ordinary felony case is not necessarily to be computed at the maximum rates, it seems to me advisable to allow compensation in an amount somewhat less than the maximum but which, in total, allows compensation in substantial amount.

Accordingly, I approve the application in the total amount of $1,800.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Carnevale
624 F. Supp. 381 (D. Rhode Island, 1985)
United States v. Terrance Bailey
581 F.2d 984 (D.C. Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Hildebrandt
420 F. Supp. 476 (S.D. New York, 1975)
United States v. Hunter
385 F. Supp. 358 (District of Columbia, 1974)
United States v. Thompson
361 F. Supp. 879 (District of Columbia, 1973)
United States v. James
301 F. Supp. 107 (W.D. Texas, 1969)
United States v. Ursini
296 F. Supp. 1155 (D. Connecticut, 1968)
United States v. Aadal
280 F. Supp. 866 (S.D. New York, 1967)
United States v. Wolfson
282 F. Supp. 772 (S.D. New York, 1967)
People v. Perry
27 A.D.2d 154 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
United States v. Stith
261 F. Supp. 401 (District of Columbia, 1966)
United States v. Lowery
261 F. Supp. 396 (District of Columbia, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 F. Supp. 929, 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dodge-nysd-1966.