United States v. Doctrie

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Doctrie

233 F. App'x 983

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 30, 2007·No. No. 07-11284·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rick D. Collum, appointed counsel for Rober Doctrie, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Doctrie’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rick D. Collum, appointed counsel for Rober Doctrie, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Doctrie’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Doctrie, 233 F. App'x 983 (11th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

233 F. App'x 983 (United States v. Doctrie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related