United States v. Dmitry Fomichev

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Dmitry Fomichev. Read the opinion of the Court — 899 F.3d 766
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 30, 2018·No. 16-50227·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-50227 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:13-cr-00185- SVW-1 DMITRY FOMICHEV, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER

Filed November 30, 2018

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Morgan Christen, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The government’s motion for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing, filed on September 27, 2018, is GRANTED.

The opinion filed on August 8, 2018, and appearing at 899 F.3d 766, is amended as follows:

On page nine of the slip opinion, within the first paragraph of the “DISCUSSION” section, replace “The last argument is raised for the first time on appeal, so we do not address it.” with “The last argument is raised for the first time on appeal, and we decline to address it.” Following that 2 UNITED STATES V. FOMICHEV

sentence, replace the citation to United States ex rel. Kelly v. Serco, Inc., 846 F.3d 325, 336 (9th Cir. 2017) with the following citation: United States v. Spilotro, 800 F.2d 959, 963 (9th Cir. 1986).

With this amendment, the panel unanimously votes to deny the government’s petition for panel rehearing, filed on September 27, 2018. No further petitions for en banc or panel rehearing shall be permitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dmitry Fomichev, (9th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Dmitry Fomichev (United States v. Dmitry Fomichev) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Ex Rel. Kelly v. Serco, Inc.
846 F.3d 325 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Dmitry Fomichev
899 F.3d 766 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)