United States v. DJO Global, Inc.
This text of 678 F. App'x 594 (United States v. DJO Global, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Relators Doris Modglin and Russ Milko appeal the district court’s grant of Defendant’s motions to dismiss. For reasons stated in the district court’s two well-reasoned opinions, dated September 2, 2014, and May 8,2015, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
'pjjjg disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
678 F. App'x 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-djo-global-inc-ca9-2017.