United States v. Dixon

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Dixon. Read the opinion of the Court — 273 F.3d 636
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 1, 2002·No. 02-10131·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10131 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JIMMY LEE DIXON,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CR-84-1 -------------------- October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Jimmy Lee Dixon has moved for

leave to withdraw in this criminal appeal following a remand for

resentencing and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dixon has not filed a response

to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-10131 -2-

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dixon, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Dixon (United States v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)