United States v. Dixon

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Dixon

158 F. App'x 202

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 30, 2005·No. No. 05-12043; D.C. Docket No. 04-00202-CR-J-32-HTS·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Maurice C. Grant, appointed counsel for Tony Edward Dixon in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and [203]*203Dixon’s conviction and sentence are AF FIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Maurice C. Grant, appointed counsel for Tony Edward Dixon in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and [203]*203Dixon’s conviction and sentence are AF FIRMED.

United States v. Dixon, 158 F. App'x 202 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

158 F. App'x 202 (United States v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related