United States v. Divine
This text of 104 F. App'x 689 (United States v. Divine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Steven Wayne Divine appeals the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, and uttering fictitious obligations, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 514(a)(1) and (2).
Divine contends that the district court erred by concluding that it lacked discretion to depart under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13 for significantly reduced mental capacity, because it misinterpreted that provision to apply only to cognitive impairments. We disagree with Divine’s contention. It is apparent from the record that the court was aware of its authority to depart on the permissible grounds offered by Divine, but declined to do so. Absent some indication that the district court believed it lacked authority to depart, this court may not review the district court’s discretionary refusal to depart downward. See United States v. Webster, 108 F.3d 1156, 1158-59 (9th Cir.1997).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 F. App'x 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-divine-ca9-2004.