United States v. District of Columbia

D.C. Circuit

United States v. District of Columbia

709 F.2d 1521, 228 U.S. App. D.C. 295, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28846

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 14, 1983

Docket82-2338

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 709 F.2d 1521 (United States v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. District of Columbia, 709 F.2d 1521, 228 U.S. App. D.C. 295, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28846 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion for summary affirmance, as well as appellant’s motion to vacate and remand, and the response and reply thereto, it is

ORDERED by the Court that appellee’s motion for summary affirmance is denied. The passage of Pub.L. No. 97-447, 96 Stat. 2364 (January 12, 1983) (amending 36 U.S.C. § 1201 et seq.; to be codified at 36 U.S.C. § 1219), which exempts the United States Historical Society from paying, collecting or accounting “for any tax ... applicable to taxable events occurring within the United States Capital Building and grounds on or after January 1, 1964.” Id., has rendered the case moot. It is therefore

FURTHER ORDERED by the Court that the judgment of the District Court, 558 F.Supp. 213, is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint. See United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950). It is

FURTHER ORDERED by the Court, sua sponte, that the Clerk withhold issuance of the mandate until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See Local Rule 14, as amended June 15, 1982.

WILKEY, Circuit Judge, did not participate in the foregoing order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion for summary affirmance, as well as appellant’s motion to vacate and remand, and the response and reply thereto, it is

ORDERED by the Court that appellee’s motion for summary affirmance is denied. The passage of Pub.L. No. 97-447, 96 Stat. 2364 (January 12, 1983) (amending 36 U.S.C. § 1201 et seq.; to be codified at 36 U.S.C. § 1219), which exempts the United States Historical Society from paying, collecting or accounting “for any tax ... applicable to taxable events occurring within the United States Capital Building and grounds on or after January 1, 1964.” Id., has rendered the case moot. It is therefore

FURTHER ORDERED by the Court that the judgment of the District Court, 558 F.Supp. 213, is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint. See United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950). It is

FURTHER ORDERED by the Court, sua sponte, that the Clerk withhold issuance of the mandate until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See Local Rule 14, as amended June 15, 1982.

WILKEY, Circuit Judge, did not participate in the foregoing order.

Center for Science in the Public Interest v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the Treasury, Wine Institute, Center for Science in the Public Interest v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the Treasury, Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, Inc., Center for Science in the Public Interest v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the Treasury, Wine Institute

727 F.2d 1161 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)

Center for Science in the Public Interest v. Regan

727 F.2d 1161 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

709 F.2d 1521, 228 U.S. App. D.C. 295, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-district-of-columbia-cadc-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack